Scaling Canadian Startups
Startup Strategy

Smarter Ways to Evaluate Technical Candidates 2025

CloudVital Team
June 10, 2025
8 min read
8 min read

Hiring technical talent is no longer just about finding someone with the right skills. It’s about proving they can apply those skills independently, in real-world conditions, and without shortcuts.

Today’s hiring landscape has changed dramatically. With remote interviews, online coding platforms, and generative AI tools like ChatGPT, it’s harder than ever to know if a candidate is truly solving a problem, or just pasting in a polished response.

Why traditional technical evaluations fall short

A résumé might show the right titles and buzzwords. A remote coding test might return a flawless solution. But behind the scenes? Many candidates rely on AI assistance or external tools to complete assessments.

While using AI isn’t inherently bad (many professionals use it responsibly on the job), hiring decisions still depend on knowing what a candidate can do on their own, especially during high-stakes or time-sensitive work.

Smarter & practical evaluation methods

To adapt, leading organizations are shifting toward realistic, hands-on evaluations that reflect the actual work environment.

  1. Simulate on-the-job scenarios
  2. Replace abstract puzzles with practical tasks like:
    • Debugging and troubleshooting under time constraints
    • Reviewing pull requests for clarity and logic
    • Writing short, production-level scripts
    • Handling small design or infrastructure challenges
    These exercises can be time-bound or observed in real time to minimize AI overreliance and reflect how candidates think and respond under pressure.
  3. Add contextual interviews
  4. Rather than asking general “tell me about a time” questions, drill into:
    • How they handled a deployment failure
    • Why they chose a certain schema for a data model
    • What trade-offs they made in past architecture decisions
    This helps expose actual depth of understanding, something AI can’t fake well in a back-and-forth conversation.
  5. Test collaboration, not just code
  6. Even the most technically sound candidate can derail a project if they can’t work with others. Remote work makes this even more critical.
    • Pair programming
    • Async Slack-style communications
    • Stand-up and status updates
    You’ll get a better sense of their communication, clarity, and collaboration style, not just what’s in their repo.
  7. Enforce test integrity (without micromanaging)
  8. When online assessments are necessary, consider:
    • Time-boxed tasks with limited browser access
    • Live interview components to validate earlier responses
    • Clear policy disclosures on use of AI or external help
    The goal isn’t to create a test environment that’s punitive, but to set realistic boundaries that mirror the expectations of the actual job.
How CloudVital helps

At CloudVital, we’ve built Codevital to help companies validate technical skills authentically and efficiently.

Whether you're hiring developers, cloud engineers, or data professionals, Codevital provides:

  • Hands-on, role-specific technical challenges
  • Practical scenarios that reduce AI-dependency
  • Optional real-time assessments and asynchronous reviews
  • Custom evaluation tools aligned to your stack and values
Learn more

Want to improve hiring signals while filtering out false positives?

Connect with us to bring real-world skill validation into your hiring process.